January 31, 2011 § Leave a comment
PALO ALTO, CA — Last Saturday evening, the January Quora Active User Party took place at The Old Pro, a local sports bar. Over 100 active contributors showed up to mindmeld over beers and televised sports. Anticipation had been incubating for weeks in this rather socially well-adjusted crowd. Many were looking forward to rubbing shoulders with Quora celebrities like Charlie “Awk Hottie” Cheever, Rebekah “Daniel Day-Lewis” Cox, and Yishan “STFU Scoble” Wong. As they arrived, party attendees were checked against a strict guest list, and the party entrance was manned by none other than Mark “He’s not black?” Bodnick and a bouncer who looked quite like Biggie Smalls.
« Read the rest of this entry »
January 31, 2011 § 6 Comments
By: Tristan Kromer
our new policy on self-promoting “social media experts” is to just kill them all, and let God sort it out. – Quora User (name redacted)
I was quite admittedly flattered when I was invited to join the closed Quora Review group on Facebook but confused. Why would the elite from Quora invite me to join? Why do they need a Facebook group? What’s the group for? And why couldn’t someone have invited me to the Quora party instead? (Sounds way more fun.)
Now I’m pretty sure I don’t belong. « Read the rest of this entry »
January 30, 2011 § 86 Comments
By: Dan Kaplan
“This used to be my playground. This used to be my childhood dream. This used be the place I ran to…whenever I was in need.” -Madonna
So Robert Scoble, it seems you don’t like the heat. In the bygone days of what feels like ten minutes ago, you, the ubiquitous tech evangelist, larger-than-life personality and Rackspace blogger, couldn’t stop gushing about how great Quora was. Was Quora, you asked in the halcyon age of last December, the biggest blogging innovation in 10 years? Of course it was. Back in them days and throughout January, you could post answers to a wide range of questions and your ardent Twitter followers could upvote them en masse and each upvote and congratulatory comment could generate that awesome squirt of dopamine in your brain. And wasn’t it grand?
But, my, how quickly things can change. « Read the rest of this entry »
January 29, 2011 § 9 Comments
By: Michael Wolfe
Vivek Wadhwa, I like a lot of your writing and am into many of the topics you cover, especially international entrepreneurship and the role of entrepreneurship in economic development. But at the risk of never getting invited to join you on one of your international boondoggles, I just cannot let your Quora post remain un-deconstructed. Please, all, follow along with me here. « Read the rest of this entry »
January 28, 2011 § Leave a comment
By: Catalin Braescu
Let me introduce myself: I’m Catalin Braescu (you may call me “Cat”) co-founder of Silicon Nile. We aim to be an Internet conglomerate on the scope (and size) of Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu (all in one) aiming for #1 position on the Arab market.
Because of our special insight on the Arab market, I feel compelled to explain a bit what is going on these days in Egypt. I see a lot of uninformed comments – it just itches me to add my 2 cents.
« Read the rest of this entry »
January 28, 2011 § 7 Comments
By: June Lin
Of late, a lot of people have been writing about the problems Quora has with scaling, suggesting UI changes, advocating for new reviewer tools, and so forth. Let’s all admit that Quora (company) isn’t going to be implementing any of these changes soon, but there are things that you can do as a user within the bounds of the current feature set to make your experience browsing Quora less like “body-surfing through shit” and more like partaking in tasty morsel after tasty morsel in a nine course meal at Per Se. « Read the rest of this entry »
January 28, 2011 § 3 Comments
By: Shannon Larson
The key to understanding all there is to Quora is right there in the tagline welcoming all new users: A continually improving collection of questions and answers created, edited, and organized by everyone who uses it.
When I first joined Quora, back when it was in invite-only beta, new users approached the service with a bit of reverance. We had heard about how great it was – a well of insight, knowledge, and first-rate advice – and we had been invited to take part. Before posting, everyone spent a few days lurking – following questions, upvoting outstanding answers, and generally learning how the site works. Questions were thought-provoking or addressed a very specific need. The prevailing attitude of what constituted an acceptable answer can be represented by a question posted in June, “Should you only answer questions on Quora if you happen to be an expert in that subject area?” Back then, practically every answer marked unhelpful was a genuinely funny joke, often thoughtfully composed (see Ludi Rehak’s list of the best non-helpful joke answers). « Read the rest of this entry »
January 28, 2011 § 22 Comments
By: Christopher Lin
The hot topic for Quora these days (and ever) is the challenge of maintaining high content quality in the face of the great unwashed masses who don’t understand the site’s norms for rigor and eloquence. Solutions abound: Forced tutorials! Sub-Quoras! Make everybody a reviewer! Pay for full-time reviewers! PeopleRank!
Implicit in these solutions is the assumption that the old model of human administration and crowdsourced wisdom in the form of up- and downvotes are insufficient to address problems of the scale that Quora faces. Although this is true in the sense that throwing more warm bodies at the problem isn’t going to do much, I think it is incorrect to assume that a crowdsourced system of moderation is fundamentally unscalable. We know from projects like Wikipedia and large online forums that relying on a system of moderation driven by a small team of users with special powers and privileges can actually be very effective for encouraging desired behaviour and filtering out disruptive users. Rather than abandoning the attempt at human moderation wholesale1, I think it is more instructive to figure out why such a system has worked well for other projects but does not seem to be scaling well for Quora. « Read the rest of this entry »
January 27, 2011 § 2 Comments
« Read the rest of this entry »
January 27, 2011 § 3 Comments
By: Xianhang Zhang
The Quora team talks a lot about experts & the power of expertise, and one of Quora’s explicit goals is to attract and retain more experts, empowering them to contribute high quality content on the site. At the heart of this initiative is the shiny new “PeopleRank” system supposedly in the works to algorithmically determine the precise degree of expertise each person contains. I’m here to argue that such an approach is fundamentally flawed in that, no matter how good the algorithm may be, it will not produce the desired results of attracting experts because its processing of garbage input can only product garbage output. « Read the rest of this entry »